AIESEP– Tomada de Posição Sobre Avaliação em Educação Física

PREFÁCIO

Porquê uma tomada de posição sobre a Avaliação em Educação Física? Esta tomada de posição em Avaliação em Educação Física da AIESEP tem quatro propósitos:

• Defender internacionalmente a importância central das práticas de avaliação para uma Educação Física (EF) significativa, relevante e enriquecedora;

• Aconselhar os profissionais da área da EF sobre conceitos relacionados com a avaliação, sustentados pela investigação e por práticas atuais;

• Identificar questões emergentes de investigação e os percursos de investigações prementes no âmbito de avaliação em EF;

• Proporcionar fundamentação de apoio a colegas que desejem candidatar -se a fundos de investigação sobre questões de Avaliação em EF ou que tenham oportunidade de trabalhar com, ou influenciar, decisores políticos. Os principais grupos -alvo desta tomada de posição são Professores de EF, Professores -Estudantes de EF, Responsáveis pelo Currículo de EF, Formadores de Professores de EF, Investigadores em EF, Coordenadores de EF, e decisores políticos em torno da EF. 

Os principais grupos‑alvo desta tomada de posição são Professores de EF, Professores‑Estudantes de EF, Responsáveis pelo Currículo de EF, Formadores de Professores de EF, Investigadores em EF, Coordenadores de EF, e decisores políticos em torno da EF.

Referências

Annerstedt, C., & Larsson, S. (2010). “I have my own picture of what the demands are: Grading in Swedish PEH – problems of validity, comparability and fairness.” European Physical Education Review 16 (2): 97–115.

Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. (2017). Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 473‑489.

Desrosiers, P., Y. GenetVolet, and P. Godbout. 1997. “Teachers’ assessment practices viewed through the instruments used in physical education classes.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16 (2): 211‑28.

Dinan‑Thompson, M., and D. Penney. 2015. “Assessment literacy in primary physical education.” European Physical Education Review 21 (4): 485‑503.

Erdmann, R., D. Chatzopoulos, and H. Tsormbatzoudis. 2006. “Pupils Grading: Do teachers grade according to the way they report?” International Journal of Physical Education 43 (1): 4‑10.

Georgakis, S., and R. Wilson. 2012. “Australian Physical Education and School Sport: An Exploration into Contemporary Assessment.” Asian Journal of Exercise and Sports Science 9 (1): 37‑52.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81‑112.

Hay, P.J., and D. Penney. 2009. “Proposing conditions for assessment efficacy in physical education.” European Physical Education Review 15 (3): 389‑405.

Hursh, D. 2005. “Neo‑liberalism, markets and accountability: Transforming education and undermining democracy in the United States and England.” Policy Futures in Education 3 (1): 3‑15.

Imwold, C.H., R.A. Rider, and D.J. Johnson. 1982. “The use of evaluation in public school physical education programs.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 2 (1): 13‑8.

James, A., L.L. Griffin, and P. Dodds. 2008. “The relationship between instructional alignment and the ecology of physical education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 27: 308‑326.

Kneer, M.E. 1986. “Description of physical education instruction theory/practice gap in selected secondary schools.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 5: 91‑106.

López‑Pastor, V.M., D. Kirk, E. Lorente‑Catalán, A. MacPhail, and D. Macdonald. 2013. “Alternative assessment in physical education: a review of international literature.” Sport, Education and Society 18 (1): 57‑76.

Lorente‑Catalán, E., and D. Kirk. 2016. “Student teachers’ understanding and application of assessment for learning during a physical education teacher education course.” European Physical Education Review 22 (1): 65‑81.van der Mars, H., Timken, G., & McNamee, J. (2018). Systematic Observation of Formal Assessment of Students by Teachers (SOFAST). Physical Educator, 75(3), 341‑373.

Matanin, M., and D. Tannehill. 1994. “Assessment and Grading in Physical Education.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 13 (4): 395‑405.

Michael, R. D., Webster, C., Patterson, D., Laguna, P., & Sherman, C. (2016). Standards‑based assessment, grading, and professional development of California middle school physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 277‑283.

Mintah, J.K. 2003. “Authentic assessment in physical education: Prevalence of use and perceived impact on students self‑concept, motivation, and skill achievement.” Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 7 (3):161‑74.

Penney, D., R. Brooker, P.J. Hay, and L. Gillespie. 2009. “Curriculum, pedagogy and assessment: three message systems
of schooling and dimensions of quality physical education.” Sport, Education and Society 14 (4): 421‑42.

Redelius, K., and P.J. Hay. 2012. “Student views on criterion‑referenced assessment and grading in Swedish physical education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 17 (2): 211‑25.

Roberts‑Holmes, G. and Bradbury, A. 2016. “Governance, accountability and the datafication of early years education in
England.” British Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3221

Thorburn, M. 2007. “Achieving conceptual and curriculum coherence in high‑stakes school examinations in Physical Education.” Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 12 (2): 163‑84.

Veal, M.L. 1988. “Pupil Assessment Perceptions and Practices of Secondary Teachers.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 7 (4): 327‑42.

Whittle, R. J., Benson, A. C., & Telford, A. (2017). Enrolment, content and assessment: a review of examinable senior secondary (16–19 year olds) physical education courses: an international perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 28(4), 598‑625.

Zhu, X. 2015. “Student perspectives of grading in physical education.” European Physical Education Review 21 (4): 409‑420.

Acessar