Fontes de Autoeficácia Para Aprendizagem Motora em Crianças: Revisão Sistemática da Literatura em Ensaios Clínicos
Por Sabrina Ferreira Oliveira (Autor), Mariana Gurin Manzini (Autor), Mirela de Oliveira Figueiredo (Autor), Cláudia Maria Simões Martinez (Autor).
Em Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano v. 22, 2020.
Resumo
Este estudo teve por objetivo verificar os efeitos de modelos de intervenções sobre a atividade motora de crianças elaboradas a partir da teoria da autoeficácia. Utilizou-se a revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos controlados randomizados empregando a estratégia PRISMA. Dezesseis estudos foram analisados descritivamente e revelaram que o conhecimento a partir da teoria da autoeficácia relacionada à atividade motora têm sido integrados com maior frequência em programas de intervenção em ambiente escolar, empregados de forma coletiva, estimulando aspectos relacionados à saúde das crianças e prevenção da obesidade infantil. Resultados importantes foram obtidos no desenvolvimento da autoeficácia e estímulo à atividade motora, mas não são conclusivos quanto à mediação entre essas variáveis. Contribuições acerca dos programas de intervenção são detalhadas nesse manuscrito permitindo visualizar estratégias de construção de um contexto de maestria, favorável ao estabelecimento de um adequado conceito de autoeficácia motora nas crianças e desenvolvimento de suas habilidades autorregulatórias.
Referencia
Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran V. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1994. p. 71-81.
Pajares F, Olaz F. Teoria social cognitiva e autoeficácia: uma visão geral. In: Bandura A, Azzi RG, Polydoro SA. Teoria Social Cognitiva: conceitos básicos. 1 Ed. São Paulo: Artmed Editora, 2008. p. 97-114.
Bruzi A, Bastos F. Efeito da demonstração autocontrolada na aprendizagem motora. In: Tani G. Comportamento Motor: conceitos, estudos e aplicações. 1 Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2016. p. 89-96.
Walter C, Bastos FH, Araújo UO, Tani G. Estudo da Aprendizagem Motora Autocontrolada: Fundamentos e Perspectivas. In: Tani G. Comportamento Motor: conceitos, estudos e aplicações. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2016. p.17-23.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 1977; 84(2): 191-215.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2011; 343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
Chen JL, Weiss S, Heyman MB, Lustig RH. Efficacy of a child-centred and family-based program in promoting healthy weight and healthy behaviors in Chinese American children: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Public Health, 2009; 32(2):219–229. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdp105.
Weiss MR, Mccullagh P, Smith AL, Berlant AR. Observational Learning and the Fearful Child: Influence of Peer Models on Swimming Skill Performance and Psychological Responses. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1998; 69(4):380-394, DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607712.
Bergh IH,Bjelland M, Grydeland M, Lien N, Andersen LF, Klepp KI et al. Mid-way and post-intervention effects on potential determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior, results of the HEIA study - a multi-component school-based randomized trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012; 9(63). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-63
Clark S, Ste-Marie D. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007; 25(5):577-586.
Keihner AJ, Meigs R, Sugerman S, Backman D, Garbolino T, Mitchell P. The Power Play! Campaign’s School Idea & Resource Kits Improve Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Physical Activity among Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Children. J Nutr Educ Behav., 2011; 43(4):S122-S129.
Robinson L, Palmer K, Bub K. Effect of the Children’s Health Activity Motor Program on Motor Skills and Self-Regulation in Head Start Preschoolers: An Efficacy Trial. Front. Public Health, 2016; 4:1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00173
Annesi J, Walsh S, Greenwood B. Increasing Children’s Voluntary Physical Activity Outside of School Hours Through Targeting Social Cognitive Theory Variables. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 2016; 7(4):234-241. DOI: 10.1177/2150131916656177
Ahn SJ, Johnsen K, Robertson T, Moore J, Brown S, Marable A et al. Using Virtual Pets to Promote Physical Activity in Children: An Application of the Youth Physical Activity Promotion Model. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 2015; 20(7):807-815. DOI:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018597
Annesi J, Vaughn L. Evidence-Based Referral: Effects of the Revised “Youth Fit 4 Life” Protocol on Physical Activity Outputs. Perm J., 2015; 19(3):48-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.7812/TPP/14-228.
Lwin MO, Malik S. Can Exergames Impart Health Messages? Game Play, Framing, and Drivers of Physical Activity Among Children.Journal of Health Communication, 2014; 19:136–151. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.798372
Annesi J, Smith A, Tennant G. Effects of the Start For Life treatment on physical activity in primarily African American preschool children of ages 3–5 years. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2013; 18(3):300-309.
Harrison M, Burns CF, Mcguinness M, Heslin J, Murphy NM. Influence of a health education intervention on physical activity and screen time in primary school children: ‘Switch Off—Get Active’. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2006; 9:388-394. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.012
Lirgg C, Feltz D. Teacher versus Peer Models Revisited: Effects on Motor Performance and Self-Efficacy. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1991; 62(2):217-224. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608713.
Van Stralen MM, Meij J, Velde SJ, Van Der Wal MF, Mechelen W, Knol DL et al. Mediators of the effect of the JUMP-in intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior in Dutch primary schoolchildren from disadvantaged neighborhoods. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012, 9:1:131.
Jurg ME, Kremers SPJ, Candel MJJM, Van Der Wal MF, Meij JSB. A controlled trial of a school-based environmental intervention to improve physical activity in Dutch children: JUMP-in, kids in motion. Health Promotion International, 2006; 21(4):320-330. doi:10.1093/heapro/dal03.
Goran M, Reynolds K. Interactive Multimedia for Promoting Physical Activity (IMPACT) in Children. Obes Res., 2005; 13(4):762–771.
Saunders RP, Pate RR, Felton G, Dowda M, Weinrich MC, Ward DS et al. Development of Questionnaires to Measure Psychosocial Influences on Children’s Physical Activity. Preventive Medicine, 1997; 26(PM960134241):241–247.
Engel-Yeger B, Weissman D. A comparison of motor abilities and perceived self-efficacy between children with hearing impairments and normal hearing children. Disabil. Rehabil., 2009; 31(5):352-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280801896548.
Rosenberg L, Jarus T, Bart O, Ratzon NZ. Can personal and environmental factors explain dimensions of child participation? Child: Care, Health and Development, 2010; 37(2):266-275.