Resumo

O presente estudo examina a influência das características técnicas, físicas e da idade relativa no sucesso da seleção de jogadores nas provas da Scottish Performance School. Noventa jogadores adolescentes (81 homens, 9 mulheres; média ± desvio padrão: idade = 11,3 ± 0,4 anos, altura = 149,6 ± 6,9 cm, massa 38,1 ± 4,7 kg) realizaram uma bateria de aptidão física (Sprint 20m, CMJ, 5-0 -5 testes de agilidade), antropométricos e 8 jogos reduzidos (SSG; 9v9) como parte de um programa de identificação de talentos (TID). As atividades técnicas dos jogadores (toques de bola, tempo com a bola, lançamentos em alta velocidade) e locomotoras (distância de corrida em alta velocidade, distância de sprint, acelerações e desacelerações) foram monitoradas usando unidades de medição inercial montadas nos pés durante os SSG. Os dados foram analisados por meio de testes T de amostras independentes. Análises U de Mann-Whitney foram conduzidas para examinar as diferenças entre grupos cujos dados foram determinados como sendo (não) paramétricos, com aplicação de tamanhos de efeito de Cohen. Jogadores bem-sucedidos tiveram desempenho significativamente melhor durante os testes físicos (Tamanho do efeito ± limites de confiança: Esquerdo 5-0-5 = -0,89±0,13, Direito 5-0-5 = -0,51±0,11), tiveram atividades locomotoras significativamente maiores durante SSG (alta- distância de intensidade = 0,4±26,6, acelerações horizontais = 0,59±1,19) e resultados técnicos significativamente maiores durante SSG (toques = 0,71±6,1, lançamentos = 0,49±2,5, lançamentos em alta velocidade = 0,59±2,7, tempo na bola = 0,52± 3.4) em comparação com jogadores mal sucedidos. Os jogadores bem-sucedidos tiveram atividades locomotoras e resultados técnicos significativamente maiores durante o SSG do que seus colegas malsucedidos. O monitoramento das atividades técnicas e locomotoras durante o SSG pode complementar ou substituir as baterias de testes físicos para avaliação dos processos TID no futebol. (trad. Google)

References

  1. 1.Sarmento H, Anguera MT, Pereira A, Araújo D. Talent Identification and Development in Male Football: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2018;48(4):907–31.
  2. 2.Williams AM, Ford PR, Drust B. Talent identification and development in soccer since the millennium. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(11–12):1199–210. pmid:32568000
  3. 3.le Gall F, Carling C, Williams M, Reilly T. Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(1):90–5. pmid:18835220
  4. 4.Towlson C, Cobley S, Parkin G, Lovell R. When does the influence of maturation on anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics increase and subside? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(8):1946–55. pmid:29668045
  5. 5.Deprez D, Coutts AJ, Fransen J, Deconinck F, Lenoir M, Vaeyens R, et al. Relative age, biological maturation and anaerobic characteristics in elite youth soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(10):897–903. pmid:23700327
  6. 6.Dodd KD, Newans TJ. Talent identification for soccer: Physiological aspects. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(10):1073–8. pmid:29789264
  7. 7.Bennett K.J.M V R, Fransen J. Creating a framework for talent identification and development in emerging football nations. Science and Medicine in Football. 2018;3(1):36–42.
  8. 8.Leyhr D, Murr D, Basten L, Eichler K, Hauser T, Lüdin D, et al. Biological Maturity Status in Elite Youth Soccer Players: A Comparison of Pragmatic Diagnostics With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:587861. pmid:33345157
  9. 9.Lüdin D, Donath L, Cobley S, Romann M. Effect of bio-banding on physiological and technical-tactical key performance indicators in youth elite soccer. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022;22(11):1659–67. pmid:34542017
  10. 10.Helsen WF, Thomis M, Starkes JL, Vrijens S, Ooms G, MacMaster C, et al. Leveling the Playing Field: A New Proposed Method to Address Relative Age- and Maturity-Related Bias in Soccer. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:635379. pmid:33748755
  11. 11.Towlson C, MacMaster C, Parr J, Cumming S. One of these things is not like the other: time to differentiate between relative age and biological maturity selection biases in soccer? Sci Med Footb. 2022;6(3):273–6. pmid:35866421
  12. 12.Towlson C, Salter J, Ade JD, Enright K, Harper LD, Page RM, et al. Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance within youth soccer: One size does not fit all. J Sport Health Sci. 2020.
  13. 13.Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, Coelho e Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ. Biological maturation of youth athletes: assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(13):852–9. pmid:26084525
  14. 14.Unnithan V, White J, Georgiou A, Iga J, Drust B. Talent identification in youth soccer. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(15):1719–26. pmid:23046427
  15. 15.Towlson C, MacMaster C, Gonçalves B, Sampaio J, Toner J, MacFarlane N, et al. The effect of bio-banding on physical and psychological indicators of talent identification in academy soccer players. Sci Med Footb. 2021;5(4):280–92. pmid:35077307
  16. 16.MacMaster C, Portas M, Parkin G, Cumming S, Wilcox C, Towlson C. The effect of bio-banding on the anthropometric, physical fitness and functional movement characteristics of academy soccer players. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0260136. pmid:34843528
  17. 17.Towlson C CE, Perry J, Court D, Levett N. Practitioners’ multi-disciplinary perspectives of soccer talent according to phase of development and playing position. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2019;14(4):528–40.
  18. 18.Martindale RJ, Collins D, Douglas C, Whike A. Examining the ecological validity of the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(1):41–7. pmid:22917218
  19. 19.Clemente FM P G, Oliveira R, Aquino R, Araújo R, Silva R, Sarmento H, et al. A systematic review of the criterion validity and reliability of technical and tactical field-based tests in soccer. In: Praça G, Oliveira R., Aquino R., Araújo R., Silva R., Sarmento H., Afonso J, editor.: International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching; 2022. p. 1462–87.
  20. 20.O’Brien-Smith J, Bennett K, Fransen J, Smith M. Same or different? A comparison of anthropometry, physical fitness and perceptual motor characteristics in male and female youth soccer players. Science and Medicine in Football; 2020; 4(1): 37–44.
  21. 21.Winter EM, Maughan RJ. Requirements for ethics approvals. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(10):985. pmid:19847681
  22. 22.Harley JA, Lovell RJ, Barnes CA, Portas MD, Weston M. The interchangeability of global positioning system and semiautomated video-based performance data during elite soccer match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(8):2334–6. pmid:21747299
  23. 23.Akenhead R, French D, Thompson KG, Hayes PR. The acceleration dependent validity and reliability of 10 Hz GPS. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(5):562–6. pmid:24041579
  24. 24.Lewis G, Towlson C, Roversi P, Domogalla C, Herrington L, Barrett S. Quantifying volume and high-speed technical actions of professional soccer players using foot-mounted inertial measurement units. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0263518. pmid:35113962
  25. 25.Lacome M, Simpson BM, Cholley Y, Lambert P, Buchheit M. Small-Sided Games in Elite Soccer: Does One Size Fit All? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(5):568–76. pmid:28714774
  26. 26.Marris J, Barrett S, Abt G, Towlson C. Quantifying technical actions in professional soccer using foot-mounted inertial measurement units. Sci Med Footb. 2022;6(2):203–14. pmid:35475748
  27. 27.Stewart A. Kinanthropometry—the interdisciplinary discipline. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(4):373. pmid:17365523
  28. 28.Fransen J, Bush S, Woodcock S, Novak A, Deprez D, Baxter-Jones ADG, et al. Improving the Prediction of Maturity From Anthropometric Variables Using a Maturity Ratio. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018;30(2):296–307. pmid:28605273
  29. 29.Chaalali A, Rouissi M, Chtara M, Owen A, Bragazzi NL, Moalla W, et al. Agility training in young elite soccer players: promising results compared to change of direction drills. Biol Sport. 2016;33(4):345–51. pmid:28090138
  30. 30.Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(3):551–5. pmid:15320660
  31. 31.Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13. pmid:19092709
  32. 32.Wen D, Robertson S, Hu G, Song B, Chen H. Measurement properties and feasibility of the Loughborough soccer passing test: A systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(15):1682–94. pmid:29171340
  33. 33.Russell M, Rees G, Kingsley MI. Technical demands of soccer match play in the English championship. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(10):2869–73. pmid:23287830
  34. 34.Salter J, De Ste Croix MBA, Hughes JD, Weston M, Towlson C. Monitoring Practices of Training Load and Biological Maturity in UK Soccer Academies. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;16(3):395–406. pmid:33401237
  35. 35.Towlson C, Cobley S, Midgley AW, Garrett A, Parkin G, Lovell R. Relative Age, Maturation and Physical Biases on Position Allocation in Elite-Youth Soccer. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(3):201–9. pmid:28219108
  36. 36.Waldron M. Differences in the Game Specific Skills of Elite and Sub-Elite Youth Football Players: Implications for Talent Identification. In: Worsfold P, editor.: International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport; 2010. p. 9–24.
  37. 37.Höner O, Murr D, Larkin P, Schreiner R, Leyhr D. Nationwide Subjective and Objective Assessments of Potential Talent Predictors in Elite Youth Soccer: An Investigation of Prognostic Validity in a Prospective Study. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:638227. pmid:34124654
  38. 38.Salter J. Estimating somatic maturity in adolescent soccer players: Methodological comparisons. In: Sean Cumming JDH, De Ste Croix Mark, editor. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 2022. p. 11–7.
  39. 39.Tanner JM. Growth of the human at the time of adolescence. Lect Sci Basis Med. 1953;1:308–63. pmid:13184740
  40. 40.Garn SM, Rohmann CG. Communalities of the ossification centers of the hand and wrist. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1959;17(4):319–23. pmid:13826603
  41. 41.Leyhr D, Raabe J, Schultz F, Kelava A, Höner O. The adolescent motor performance development of elite female soccer players: A study of prognostic relevance for future success in adulthood using multilevel modelling. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(11–12):1342–51. pmid:31680634
  42. 42.Lovell R, Fransen J, Ryan R, Massard T, Cross R, Eggers T, et al. Biological maturation and match running performance: A national football (soccer) federation perspective. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(10):1139–45. pmid:31056279
  43. 43.Gil SM, Badiola A, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Zabala-Lili J, Gravina L, Santos-Concejero J, et al. Relationship between the relative age effect and anthropometry, maturity and performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(5):479–86. pmid:24050650
  44. 44.Drenowatz C, Eisenmann JC, Pfeiffer KA, Wickel EE, Gentile D, Walsh D. Maturity-related differences in physical activity among 10- to 12-year-old girls. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22(1):18–22. pmid:19309682
  45. 45.Wickel EE, Eisenmann JC. Maturity-related differences in physical activity among 13- to 14-year-old adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007;19(4):384–92. pmid:18089906
  46. 46.Sweeney L, Taylor J, MacNamara Á. Push and Pull Factors: Contextualising Biological Maturation and Relative Age in Talent Development Systems. Children (Basel). 2023;10(1). pmid:36670680
  47. 47.Sieghartsleitner R, Zuber C, Zibung M, Conzelmann A. Science or Coaches’ Eye?—Both! Beneficial Collaboration of Multidimensional Measurements and Coach Assessments for Efficient Talent Selection in Elite Youth Football. J Sports Sci Med. 2019;18(1):32–43. pmid:30787649

Acessar