O Futuro da Tecnologia na Educação em Saúde: Desafiando o Dogma do Ensino Tradicional

Durante a década de 1990, fui convidado a trabalhar no primeiro Comitê de Padrões de Pós-Graduação para rever as sete áreas de educador em saúde responsabilidades. Ficamos maravilhados com o fato de competências criadas há 25 anos eram tão práticas e em meados da década de 1990, especialmente à luz do mudanças de tecnologia que estavam em andamento. Historicamente, nossa profissão teve grande previsão por seus líderes. Precisamos manter essa prática. Nós precisamos olhar para a nossa profissão, não só em O futuro próximo, mas como seremos em 25 anos. Em 25 anos, os acadêmicos AAHE de 2034 estarão de pé para sua apresentação olhando sobre os líderes / lendas atuais da profissão. Como mencionado anteriormente, a tecnologia será uma influência incrível em nossa profissão, quer queiramos ou não. Não vamos ser como os relojoeiros suíços e permitir o nosso orgulho, ignorância ou recusa para reconhecer que as outras idéias podem funcionar . Vamos criar o nosso futuro incentivando pesquisa para nos mostrar como incorporar melhor tecnologia no que fazemos. Eu desafio nossos jovens profissionais a criar o nosso futuro realizando pesquisas para nos mostrar como melhor incorporar a tecnologia. Para aqueles de vocês, que sentem o chamado, por favor contate-me. Eu adoraria trabalhar com você - onde quer que eu esteja

Referencias

1. Kittleson MJ. The history of the HEDIR: One person’s view. American Journal of Health Studies. 1997;13(4):215-220.
2. Rogers E. Diffusions of Innovations, 5th edition. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2003:281. 
3. O’Brien T. Could your iPhone or BlackBerry ever replace your laptop? Available at http://www.switched.com/tag/windowsmobile. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
4. Williams B. WingX: Flight planning in the palm of your hand. Available at http://www. bruceair.com/product_reviews/WingX.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
5. Massey M. What you are is where you were when. Lakewood, Washington: The Richardson Co. Training Media; 1972.
6. HarrisInteractive. Cell phones key to teens’ social lives, 47% can text with eyes closed (online). Available at http://www.marketingcharts. com/interactive/cell-phones-key-to-teens-sociallives-47-can-text-with-eyes-closed-6126/harrisctia-teen-cell-phone-use-die-without-cellphone-august-2008jpg. Accessed July 1, 2009.
7. CTIA. National study reveals how teens are shaping & reshaping their wireless world. Study sheds new light on teens’ cell phone habits, expectations & dream phone wishes (online). Available at http://ctia.org/media/press/body. cfm/prid/1774. Accessed July 1, 2009.
8. Oreskovic A. Google widens lead in U.S. searches: comScore. Available at http://www. reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE53E6YT20090415. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
9. Tschabitscher H. How many emails are sent every day. Available at http://email.about.com/ od/emailtrivia/f/emails_per_day.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
10. ZDNet Research. 2.3 trillion text messages sent by 2010 (online). Available at http:// blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=12176. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
11. Hesseldahl A. Apple’s iPod Problem. Available at http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc2008122_679456.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
12. Glover ED. A new health education paradigm: Uncommon thoughts about common matters. Am J Health Educ. 2004; 35(5):260-271. 
13. Gold RS, Kelly MA. Is knowledge really power? Health Education. 1988; 19(4):40-46. 
14. Shieh D. Professors regard online instruction as less effective than classroom learning 316 American Journal of Health Education — November/December 2009, Volume 40, No. 6 Mark J. Kittleson
(online). Available at http://chronicle.com/ free/2009/02/11232n.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
15. Caywood K and Duckett J. Online vs oncampus learning in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education. 2003; 26: 98-105. 
16. Koljactic M, Silva M, Varas E, Vergara A. Comparison of two modes of Web-based instruction in a course on environmental protection. Br J Educ Technol. 2004; 35(5):657-658. 
17. Holloman HL, Warren LL. Online instruction: Are the outcomes the same? Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2005; 32(2):148-151.
 18. Gallagher JE, Dobrosielski-Vergona KA, Wingard, RG, Williams, TM. Web-based vs. traditional classroom instruction in gerontology: A pilot study. J Dent Hyg. 2005; 79(3):1-10. 
19. Bata-Jones B, Avery MD. Teaching pharmacology to graduate nursing students: Evaluation and comparison of Web-based and Face-to-Face methods. J Nurs Educ. 2004; 43(4):185-189. 
20. Kraiger K., Stewart D. Re:SEARCH: Is elearning as effective as classroom learning? T+D Magazine. 2005; 59(8):18. 
21. Beasley JM. Evaluation of a Web-based, pictorial diet history questionnaire. Public Health Nutr [1368-9800]. 2009;12(5):651. 
22. Campbell M., Gibson W, Hall A, Richards D, Callery P. Online vs. Face-to-Face discussion in a Web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45:750–759.
 23. Ragon RE, Kleoppel JW. Comparison of outcomes on like exams, administered to in-residence and asynchronous distance-based Pharm.D. students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2004;8(4):15-24.
 24. Maki, RH, Maki WS, Patterson M, Whittaker PD. Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: I, learning and satisfaction in online versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 2000;32:230-239. 
25. Corral M, Guevara JC, Luquin PA, Pena HJ, Otero JJM. Usefulness of an internet-based thematic learning network: Comparison of effectiveness with traditional teaching. Med Inform Internet Med. 2006;31(1):59-66. 
26. Shachar M, Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2003;4(2). Available at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/153/704. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
27. Williams SL. The effectiveness of distance education in allied health science programs: A meta-analysis of outcomes. The American Journal of Distance Education. 2006; 20(3):127-141. 
28. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B. The effectiveness of Web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption-A systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;47:17-26. 
29. Detwiler JE. Comparing student performance in online and blended sections of a GIS programming class. Transactions in GIS. 2008;12(1):131-144. 
30. Yang YC, Newby T, Bill R. Facilitating interactions through structured Web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners’ critical thinking skills. Computers and Education. 2008;50:1572-1585. 
31. University of Alabama Birmingham. A model for assessing candidate dispositions in health education non-teacher education. Available at http://www.ed.uab.edu/healtheducation/ documents/Dispositionsnonteachered.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
32. Moore W. An assessment of online learning in a dental hygiene baccalaureate degree completion program. J Dent Hyg. 2007;81(4). 
33. Louis D. Adjuncts: Solutions for a mistreated majority. Available at http://chronicle. com/weekly/v55/i39/39a07201.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
34. Hanna A. National Institutes of Health on Second Life. Available at http://www.collaborationproject.org/display/case/National+In stitutes+of+Health+on+Second+Life. Accessed July 1, 2009.
 35. Jackson County Health Department. JCHD sexual health. Available at http://www. myspace.com/jchdsexualhealth. Accessed July 1, 2009. 
36. Barack Obama announces his vice president by text message + Making Technology History. Available at http://butyoureagirl. com/2008/08/23/barack-obama-announceshis-vice-president-by-text-message-makingtechnology-history/. Accessed July 1, 2009.

Acessar Arquivo