Pessoal, recebemos o alerta abaixo atravé do convênio CEV-Centro de Documentação de Leipzig. Seria interessante termos o resumo em português pra cadastrar a revista e o artigo na biblioteca do CEV. No programa "adote um resumo" o tradutor é citado no fim do resumo com link para a página no quem e quem). Quem se habilita? Favor escrever direto para laercio@cev.org.br
de IAT-Suchagent <siv@iat.uni-leipzig.de>
data 30 de abril de 2010 00:03
assunto SPRINT: 1 Neuerfassung in den IAT-Datenbanken
Profil ’Handball 1’ - Datenbank SPONET5
1. Buchheit, M., Spencer, M. & Ahmaidi, S. (2010). Reliability, usefulness, and validity of a repeated sprint and jump ability test (Reliabilität, Nutzen und Validität eines Wiederholungstests der Sprint- und Sprungfähigkeit). Int. J. Sports Physiology and Performance, 5 (1), . Zugriff am 29.04.2010 unter (clique aqui)
Purpose: Two studies involving 122 handball players were conducted to assess the reliability, usefulness, and validity of a repeated shuttle-sprint and jump ability (RSSJA) test. The test consisted of 6 × (2 × 12.5-m) sprints departing on 25 s, with a countermovement jump performed during recovery between sprints. Methods: For the reliability and usefulness study, 14 well-trained male handball players performed the RSSJA test 7 d apart. Reliability of the test variables was assessed by the typical error of measurement, expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV). The minimal changes likely to be “real” in sprint time and jump power were also calculated. For the validity study, players of seven teams (national to international levels, women and men) performed the RSSJA test. Results: CV values for best and mean sprint time were 1.0% (90% CL, 0.7 to 1.6) and 1.0% (90% CL, 0.7 to 1.4). CV values for best and mean jump peak power were 1.7% (90% CL, 1.2 to 2.7) and 1.5% (90% CL, 1.1 to 2.5). The percent sprint and jump decrements were less reliable, with CVs of 22.3% (90% CL, 15.7 to 38.3) and 34.8% (90% CL, 24.2 to 61.8). Minimal changes likely to be “real” for mean sprint time and jumping peak power were —2.6% and 4.8%. Qualitative analysis revealed that the majority of between-team differences were rated as “almost certain” (ie, 100% probability that the true differences were meaningful) for mean sprint and jump performances. Conclusion: The RSSJA test is reliable and valid to assess repeated explosive effort sequences in team sports such as handball. Test results are likely to be representative of gender and competition level; thus the test could be used to discriminate across playing standards and monitor fitness levels. (Mikrofiche-Nummer: 19180)
Comentários
Por
Gianna Emanuella Batista
em 13 de Setembro de 2011 às 10:19.
oi queria saber se tem esse artigo em portugues
Por
Laercio Elias Pereira
em 15 de Setembro de 2011 às 18:04.
Gianna, ainda não conseguimos alguém que traduza. Laercio
Para comentar, é necessário ser cadastrado no CEV fazer parte dessa comunidade.
