Relações Internacionais e desempenho esportivo Uma análise do quadro de medalhas olímpico a partir do Índice de Poder Mundial
Por Carlos Pulleiro Méndez (Autor), Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba (Autor).
Resumo
Esta pesquisa trata do desempenho esportivo dos países a partir das Relações Internacionais. Considerando que na maioria dos estudos sobre esporte são minimizados ou ignorados os imperativos sistêmicos e o poder como um elemento integral que orienta a ação estatal, o objetivo deste artigo é estudar a relação entre a geoestrutura de poder internacional e o quadro de medalhas olímpico. Para isso, metodologicamente, é realizada uma análise correlacional entre o Índice de Poder Mundial (IPM) e o quadro de medalhas dos Jogos Olímpicos de Verão e de Inverno, desde a edição de Atlanta 1996 até Pequim 2022. Os resultados mostram que há uma alta correlação positiva nas diferentes Olimpíadas avaliadas, sustentando, desde as Relações Internacionais, que a geoestrutura internacional delimita e determina o desenho da diplomacia esportiva estatal no que diz respeito ao desempenho esportivo: priorização do esporte na agenda governamental, o planejamento de medalhas e os recursos destinados ao esporte de elite.
Referências
ABU EL KHEIR-MATARIA, Wafa et al. COVID-19 vaccine intercountry distribution inequality and its underlying factors: a combined concentration index analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Frontiers Public Health, v. 12, p. 1-9, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348088
APANGO, Mónica et al. The semiperipheral states in the international geostructure. In: MORALES, Daniel; ROCHA, Alberto (ed.). National power and international geostructure. Singapur: Springer, 2024. p. 183-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1180-2_8
BEACOM, Aaron. International diplomacy and the Olympic Movement. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032942
BERG, Brennan K.; KESSLER, Seth A.; HUNT, Thomas M. A realist perspective of Sport Management Program and the H.J. Lutcher Stark governmental perceptions of Olympic boycott movements, 1936–2008. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, v. 4, n. 3, p. 307-320, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.694113
BLOYCE, Daniel; SMITH, Andy. Sport policy and development: an introduction. London: Routledge, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203890684
BRANNAGAN, Paul Michael; GIULIANOTTI, Richard. Soft power and soft disempowerment: Qatar, global sport and football’s 2022 world cup finals. Leisure Studies, v. 34, n. 6, p. 703-719, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.964291
CARTER, Thomas F. ¿Hasta la victoria siempre? The evolution and future of revolutionary sport. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, v. 15, n. 2, p. 25-43, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2009.11090848
D'AGATI, Philip A. The Cold War and the 1984 Olympic Games: a Soviet-American surrogate war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360250
D’AGATI, Philip A. Surrogate war: politics of conflict in sports and space. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, v. 10, n. 3, p. 451-467, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1410208
DE BOSSCHER, Veerle et al. The global sporting arms race: an international comparative study on sports policy factors leading to international sporting success. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2008a.
DE BOSSCHER, Verlee et al. The paradox of measuring success of nations in elite sport. Belgeo, n. 2, p. 217-234, 2008b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10303
DE BOSSCHER, Verlee et al. Successful elite sport policies: an international comparison of the sports Policy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 nations. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Sport, 2015.
EL TINAY, Hassan. The semi-periphery and ecologically unequal exchange: carbon emissions and recursive exploitation. Environmental Sociology, v. 10, n. 2, p. 253-265, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2024.2309407
GÖTZ, Elias. Neoclassical realist theories, intervening variables, and paradigmatic boundaries. Foreign Policy Analysis, v. 17, n. 2, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa026
GREEN, Mike; OAKLEY, Ben. Elite sport development systems and playing to win: uniformity and diversity in international approaches. Leisure Studies, v. 20, n. 4, p. 247-267, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360110103598
GRIX, Jonathan; BRANNAGAN, Paul Michel. Of mechanisms and myths: conceptualizing states’ ‘soft power’ strategies through sports mega-events. Diplomacy and Statecraft, v. 27, n. 2, p. 251–272, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169791
GRIX, Jonathan; BRANNAGAN, Paul Michel; HOULIHAN, Barrie. Interrogating states’ soft power strategies: a case study of sports mega-events in Brazil and the UK. Global Society, v. 29, n. 3, p. 463-479, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1047743
GRIX, Jonathan; BRANNAGAN, Paul Michel; LEE, Donna. Entering the global arena: emerging states, soft power strategies and sports mega-events. Singapur: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7952-9
HOULIHAN, Barrie; ZHENG, Jinming. The Olympics and elite sport policy: where will it all end? The International Journal of the History of Sport, v. 30, n. 4, p. 338–355, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2013.765726
HOULIHAN, Barrie; ZHENG, Jinming. Small states: sport and politics at the margins. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, v. 7, n. 3, p. 329–344, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2014.959032
HUNT, Thomas M. Countering the Soviet threat in the Olympic medals race: the Amateur Sports Act of 1978 and American athletics policy reform. The International Journal of the History of Sport, v. 24, n. 6, p. 796-818, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360701265115
JEDLICKA, Scott R. Sport governance as global governance: theoretical perspectives on sport in the international system. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, v. 10, n. 2, p. 287–304, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1406974
JEDLICKA, Scott R.; HARRIS, Spencer; REICHE, Danyel. State intervention in sport: a comparative analysis of regime types. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, v. 12, n. 4, p. 563-581, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2020.1832134
LYU, Dongye; LEITE JUNIOR, Emanuel; PULLEIRO MÉNDEZ, Carlos. She is a Beijing girl: an examination of how Eileen Gu’s Chinese identity was constructed in Chinese media during the Beijing 2022 Olympics. Sport in Society, v. 27, n. 4, p. 484-502, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2023.2297361
MEIBAUER, Gustav et al. Forum: rethinking neoclassical realism at theory's end. International Studies Review, v. 23, n. 1, p. 268-295, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa018
MORALES RUVALCABA, Daniel. The semiperipheral states in the 21st century: measuring the structural position of regional powers and secondary regional states. International Studies, v. 57, n. 1, p. 20-50, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881719880769
MORALES RUVALCABA, Daniel. The distribution of power in the periphery: an approach with the World Power Index. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, v. 36, n. 2, p. 260-295, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1854178
MORALES RUVALCABA, Daniel. The World Power Index. In: MORALES, Daniel; ROCHA, Alberto (ed.). National power and international geostructure. Singapur: Springer, 2024. p. 45-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1180-2_3
MORALES RUVALCABA, Daniel; ROCHA VALENC